Product Comparison
NuFACE Trinity+ vs Solawave Wand
Affiliate disclosure: BestPickZone earns a commission on qualifying purchases made through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. Specs verified against manufacturer pages and live retailer listings as of June 2026; confirm current pricing before buying.
Buy the NuFACE Trinity+ if your goal is a real microcurrent facial-toning routine that targets the full face and neck, and buy the Solawave Wand if you want a lighter, faster red-light tool for quick glow-focused sessions. These devices do not solve the same problem equally well. NuFACE is a more serious lifting tool with larger treatment spheres and multiple intensity levels, while Solawave is a compact 4-in-1 wand built around red light, warmth, galvanic current, and massage. The right pick depends on whether you care more about sculpting or convenience.
| Spec | NuFACE Trinity+ Starter Kit | Solawave 4-in-1 Skincare Wand |
|---|---|---|
| Primary technology | Microcurrent facial toning | Red light therapy + galvanic current + warmth + massage |
| Treatment target | Full face and neck lifting and contouring | Fine lines, puffiness, glow, serum absorption |
| Attachment format | Larger treatment spheres for broader areas | Slim single wand head for smaller passes |
| Intensity / modes | 3 customizable frequencies and intensities | Single 4-in-1 routine rather than a full intensity ladder |
| Claimed routine focus | Lift, define, and tone 69 face and neck muscles | 3-minute-per-area glow and smoothing routine |
| FDA status | FDA-cleared microcurrent device | FDA-cleared wand for wrinkles and facial stimulation |
| Price at last check | $395 on NuFACE for the Trinity+ Starter Kit | $169 on Solawave for the 4-in-1 Wand |
Is the NuFACE Trinity+ worth it over the Solawave Wand?
Yes, if you actually want lifting and contouring to be the center of the routine. The Trinity+ is a bigger, more expensive, more focused microcurrent device with larger treatment heads and multiple intensities, so it is better suited to cheeks, jawline, brows, and neck than a slim red-light wand.
The NuFACE Trinity+ is the more specialized device. NuFACE says the Trinity+ Starter Kit uses three customizable frequencies and intensities and is designed to lift, define, and visibly tone 69 muscles in the face and neck. That matters because it tells you what NuFACE is actually optimized for: broader full-face coverage and a routine built around contouring rather than just surface radiance.
It is also the more committed purchase. At last check NuFACE listed the Trinity+ Starter Kit at $395, which puts it in a different budget tier than the Solawave. The payoff is scope. The larger treatment spheres cover more ground per pass, and the product positioning is clearly about facial toning, brow lift, and jawline work rather than a quick glide for under-eye puffiness before work.
- Pros: dedicated microcurrent device; broader full-face and neck coverage; multiple intensities; stronger fit for lifting and contouring routines.
- Cons: much more expensive; more routine commitment; less of a grab-and-go glow tool than the Solawave.
Skip this if you want a lighter, faster, lower-cost device for short sessions and do not care about building a full microcurrent sculpting routine.
Is the Solawave Wand better for a simpler skincare routine?
Yes. The Solawave is easier to justify if you want one compact device that layers red light, galvanic current, warmth, and massage into quick sessions. It is less of a dedicated lifting device than NuFACE, but it asks less money, less space, and less routine discipline from you.
The Solawave Wand is built around convenience and breadth rather than one dominant technology. Solawave positions it as a 4-in-1 tool combining red light therapy, galvanic current, therapeutic warmth, and facial massage, and its support materials frame it as a wrinkle- and stimulation-focused device intended for short, repeated at-home use. The slimmer format makes it feel less intimidating and easier to keep near the rest of a skincare routine.
The lower price changes the decision too. Solawave lists the 4-in-1 Wand at $169, which is far easier to treat as a skincare add-on than NuFACE's near-$400 entry point. The trade-off is focus: if your real goal is visible contour work around the jawline and cheeks, the Solawave is simply not as purpose-built for that job.
- Pros: much lower price; combines four technologies in one device; compact and easy to use in short sessions; better fit for glow and quick routine layering.
- Cons: not as purpose-built for lifting; smaller treatment format; weaker fit for a true full-face microcurrent routine.
Skip this if what you really want is a dedicated facial-toning device for contouring rather than a smaller multitasker for maintenance and glow.
Which skincare device should you buy first?
Start here: the NuFACE Trinity+ if lifting, sculpting, and a real microcurrent habit are your reason for shopping, and the Solawave if you want a lower-friction device that folds easily into a normal skincare routine. These products overlap in anti-aging language, but they do not overlap in commitment level or treatment emphasis.
Skip this first: skip the Trinity+ if you know you will not keep up with a more involved facial-toning routine, and skip the Solawave if you already know you want stronger contour-focused microcurrent work.
Frequently asked questions
Is NuFACE actually stronger than Solawave for lifting? Yes in practical use, because the Trinity+ is a dedicated microcurrent facial-toning device with larger treatment spheres and multiple intensities, while the Solawave is a 4-in-1 wand balancing red light, warmth, massage, and galvanic current.
Why is the NuFACE so much more expensive? You are paying for a more specialized category of device. The Trinity+ Starter Kit sat at $395 at last check, while the Solawave Wand was $169, and that gap reflects a full-face toning system versus a smaller multitasking wand.
Does the Solawave replace a NuFACE? Not really. It can overlap on at-home anti-aging goals, but it is better understood as a quicker, lower-commitment glow and smoothing tool than a direct replacement for a dedicated facial-toning device.
Which is easier to stick with? The Solawave usually is, simply because its slimmer format and lower routine friction make it easier to pick up for short sessions. The NuFACE makes more sense for someone intentionally shopping for a structured microcurrent habit.
Related: See our beauty hub, our Dyson Airwrap vs Shark FlexStyle comparison, and the BestPickZone homepage.
Last verified: June 2026. Specs and pricing checked against NuFACE and Solawave official product pages plus live retailer availability.