They drank together in Paris, edited each other's manuscripts, and spent 30 years in a friendship equal parts admiration and envy. Here's the honest verdict on who was better โ and why the answer is more complicated than you think.
Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald met in Paris in 1925, at a bar called the Dingo. Fitzgerald was already famous โ This Side of Paradise had made him the voice of a generation. Hemingway was unknown, working on The Sun Also Rises. Fitzgerald read it in manuscript, declared it genius, and used his influence to help get it published. Hemingway repaid him by spending the next three decades writing increasingly cutting things about Fitzgerald in letters, memoirs, and private conversations.
The friendship is one of literature's great tragic stories โ two men who genuinely recognized each other's talent, genuinely needed each other, and couldn't quite overcome the envy and the alcohol and the diverging fortunes to sustain it. And the books they produced during and after it remain among the most widely read in the American literary canon. Here's how they compare, with no sentimentality and no oversimplification.
Comparing their prose is like comparing a knife to a painting โ the question of which is "better" tells you more about what you value than it does about the writers. Hemingway's style is the most imitated in American literary history; every MFA student learns it, every minimalist traces back to it. The iceberg theory โ that the dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water โ changed how writers thought about what prose could leave unsaid.
Fitzgerald's prose in The Great Gatsby operates at a register that Hemingway's never reaches. "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past" is not minimalism โ it's maximalism refined to perfection, every syllable chosen for sound as much as sense. Amazon reviewers of Gatsby consistently describe underlining sentences, re-reading paragraphs, stopping to absorb a single image. That's not a Hemingway experience.
The Great Gatsby is 180 pages and contains more perfection per square inch than almost any novel in the American canon. It is simultaneously a love story, a class critique, a meditation on the corruption of the American Dream, and a technical achievement in point-of-view narration so precise that it took critics decades to fully understand what Fitzgerald was doing with Nick Carraway. It has sold over 25 million copies and has never been out of print. Every year it sells more than the year before.
Hemingway's masterpieces are harder to rank. A Farewell to Arms is devastating. The Sun Also Rises invented a generation's literary voice. The Old Man and the Sea won him the Pulitzer and was cited at his Nobel ceremony. But none of them is the single perfect object that Gatsby is. Hemingway's achievement is cumulative โ a body of work; Fitzgerald's is concentrated in a single 47,000-word novel that has outlasted almost everything written in the same decade.
Jay Gatsby is one of the most studied and argued-about characters in American fiction โ a self-invented man pursuing an impossible dream, simultaneously sympathetic and deluded. Nick Carraway is one of the great unreliable narrators, and his ambivalence about Gatsby mirrors the reader's own. Tom and Daisy Buchanan are among literature's most memorable villains: careless people who smash up things and creatures and then retreat back into their money or their vast carelessness. Even Jordan Baker, a minor character, lands with full specificity.
Hemingway's characters are more defined by what they don't say than what they do. Jake Barnes in The Sun Also Rises, Catherine Barkley in A Farewell to Arms, Santiago in The Old Man and the Sea โ they are vivid and memorable but deliberately opaque. That's the iceberg theory applied to character: we see what they do, we sense what they feel, but Hemingway never reaches inside them the way Fitzgerald does with Gatsby.
This round has no winner because both men behaved badly โ and that's part of what makes the story so human and so fascinating.
When Fitzgerald died in 1940, The Great Gatsby was out of print. His royalties for the entire year before his death totaled $13.13 โ the price of a single copy today. The novel's revival came when the U.S. Army distributed 155,000 copies to servicemen in World War II as part of the Armed Services Editions program. Soldiers read it in the Pacific and Europe, and returned home to tell their children about it. Fitzgerald never knew his masterpiece would become the most-read novel in American history.
Hemingway's influence on American prose is deeper, broader, and more traceable than Fitzgerald's. Raymond Carver, Cormac McCarthy, Joan Didion, Elmore Leonard, Tim O'Brien, Chuck Palahniuk โ the minimalist tradition that runs through American literature for a century after Hemingway traces directly back to him. Creative writing teachers teach "the iceberg theory" as a first principle. Every short story workshop spends at least one class on what Hemingway leaves out.
Fitzgerald's influence is more diffuse โ harder to point to in specific techniques, easier to feel in the aspiration of what literary prose can do. Writers who want to write beautifully read Fitzgerald. Writers who want to write effectively read Hemingway. The former may be a higher ambition; the latter produces more working novelists.
Hemingway outlived Fitzgerald by 21 years and used them. For Whom the Bell Tolls, The Old Man and the Sea, A Farewell to Arms, The Sun Also Rises, A Moveable Feast โ his catalog contains five books that each rank among the great American novels of the 20th century. His short stories (collected in Men Without Women and In Our Time) are studied as carefully as his novels.
Fitzgerald completed only four novels and left a fifth unfinished on his desk when he died. The unfinished The Last Tycoon is a heartbreaking fragment โ clearly on track to be extraordinary. Tender Is the Night, his follow-up to Gatsby, is brilliant but structurally flawed in ways Fitzgerald himself acknowledged. He was fighting alcoholism, financial crisis, and Zelda's illness through every page of it. The catalog is thinner than it should have been โ and everyone who has read it feels the loss of what else there might have been.
Both lives were extraordinary and tragic. But Hemingway's life has become its own genre of American mythology โ the expatriate writer in Paris, the war correspondent in Spain, the big-game hunter in Africa, the deep-sea fisherman in Cuba, four wives, a plane crash in Africa that he survived long enough to read his own obituaries. He was the most famous living American writer for three decades. His Nobel Prize speech remains one of the most read in the Prize's history.
Fitzgerald's life is tragic in a quieter, more devastating way. The brilliant young man who captured a decade, watched his wife descend into schizophrenia, drank himself into irrelevance, and died at 44 in Hollywood writing screenplays, believing himself a failure. There's a haunting quality to his story that Hemingway's โ for all its violence โ doesn't quite match. But as mythology, Hemingway's life is the bigger story. His image outlasted his books.
The Great Gatsby is 180 pages, assigns easily, reads in a long afternoon, and rewards every reread with new layers. Amazon reviewers who came to it reluctantly โ assigned in school, vaguely resentful โ consistently report being absorbed despite themselves. The prose is beautiful from the first page. The mystery of Gatsby hooks readers who don't even know they're hooked. It's the easiest entry point in American literary modernism.
Hemingway requires a different kind of patience. His famous economy of prose โ the refusal to explain, to sentimentalize, to tell you what to feel โ can read as coldness to first-time readers expecting emotional guidance. The Old Man and the Sea is the most accessible starting point: short, complete, emotionally clear. But some readers bounce off Hemingway twice before finding their way in, while almost no one bounces off Gatsby twice.
Hemingway was too ill to attend the 1954 Nobel Prize ceremony in Stockholm. He wrote his acceptance speech and had the U.S. ambassador read it aloud. It is 291 words long. In those 291 words, he describes what writing is, what a writer owes to their predecessors, and what the task of literature is. It is available on the Nobel Prize website and takes four minutes to read. It may be the best thing he ever wrote.
| Category | ๐ฟ Hemingway | โจ Fitzgerald | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| โ๏ธ Prose Style | 9.5 | 9.6 | โจ Fitzgerald (barely) |
| ๐ The Masterpiece | 9.0 | 9.9 | โจ Fitzgerald |
| ๐ฅ Characters | 8.0 | 9.5 | โจ Fitzgerald |
| ๐ฅ The Friendship | No winner โ a story in itself | ๐ค Split | |
| ๐ Literary Influence | 9.8 | 8.2 | ๐ฟ Hemingway |
| ๐ Full Catalog | 9.4 | 7.3 | ๐ฟ Hemingway |
| ๐ญ The Life | 9.4 | 8.6 | ๐ฟ Hemingway |
| ๐ช Accessibility | 7.9 | 9.5 | โจ Fitzgerald |
| ๐ Final Score | 3 Wins + Split | 4 Wins + Split | โจ Fitzgerald (by a hair) |
Fitzgerald wins on the scorecard โ barely, and only because The Great Gatsby is so extraordinary that it pulls him across the line. As a single novel, it is unmatched. As characters, his are richer. As prose beauty, his is more purely achieved. The first-time reader picking up one book will be better served by starting with Fitzgerald.
But Hemingway built something Fitzgerald couldn't: a complete body of work, a prose style that restructured American literature, and a life that became myth. The writers who learned from Hemingway outnumber those who learned from Fitzgerald by orders of magnitude. When Raymond Carver writes, when Cormac McCarthy writes, when any minimalist American novel lands on your shelf โ that's Hemingway's inheritance at work.
The real answer: they need each other. Read Gatsby to understand what American prose can aspire to. Read Hemingway to understand how American prose actually works. Then read A Moveable Feast to see how they felt about each other โ which turns out to be the most fascinating document either of them produced about the other.